000			03821cam a2200397 a 4500
001			15944721
003			KCU
005			20250708152959.0
008			091014s2010 enk b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2009043282
020			_a9780521111157 _qhardbound
020			_a0521111153 _qhardbound
035			_a15944721
035			_a(OCoLC)458737867
040			_aDLC _beng _cKCU _d KCU _eAACR2
050	0	0	_aKZ7422 _b.C66 2010
082	0	0	_a345.06 _222 _bCOM
100	1		_aCombs, Nancy A., _d1965- _eAuthor
245	1	0	_aFact-finding without facts : _bthe uncertain evidentiary foundations of international criminal convictions / _cNancy Amoury Combs.
260			_aCambridge [U.K.] ; _aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _c2010.
300			_axi, 420 p. ; _c24 cm.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 375-407) and index.
505	0		_aThe evidence supporting international criminal convictions -- Questions unanswered : international witnesses and the information unconveyed -- The educational, linguistic, and cultural impediments to accurate fact-finding at the international tribunals -- Of inconsistencies and their explanations -- Perjury : the counternarrative -- Expectations unfulfilled : the consequences of the fact-finding impediments -- Casual indifference : the trial chambers' treatment of testimonial deficiencies -- Organizational liability revived : the pro-conviction bias explained -- Help needed : practical suggestions and procedural reforms to improve fact-finding accuracy -- Assessing the status quo : they are not doing what they say they are doing but is what they are doing worth doing?
520			_a"This book explores international criminal fact-finding to reveal that criminal trials are beset by impediments that impair their ability to determine who did what to whom"--Provided by publisher.
520			_a"Fact-finding Without Facts explores international criminal fact-finding - empirically, conceptually, and normatively. After reviewing thousands of pages of transcripts from various international criminal tribunals, the author reveals that international criminal trials are beset by numerous and severe fact-finding impediments that substantially impair the tribunals' ability to determine who did what to whom. These fact-finding impediments have heretofore received virtually no publicity, let alone scholarly treatment, and they are deeply troubling not only because they raise grave concerns about the accuracy of the judgments currently being issued but because they can be expected to similarly impair the next generation of international trials that will be held at the International Criminal Court. After setting forth her empirical findings, the author considers their conceptual and normative implications. The author concludes that international criminal tribunals purport a fact-finding competence that they do not possess, and as a consequence, base their judgments on a less precise, more amorphous method of fact-finding than they publicly acknowledge. The book ends with an exploration of various normative questions, including the most foundational: whether the international tribunals' fact-finding impediments fatally undermine the international criminal justice project"--Provided by publisher.
610	2	0	_aInternational Criminal Court.
650		0	_aEvidence, Criminal (International law)
650		0	_aInternational criminal courts.
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2ddc _cBK _n0
999			_c37056 _d37056