04257cam a2200529 a 450000100090000000300040000900500170001300800410003001000170007101500190008801600180010702000240012502000210014902000260017002000230019603500130021903500210023204000310025304200080028404300300029205000210032208200200034310000320036324501090039524600670050426000640057130000260063533600260066133700280068733800270071550400640074250505240080652008890133052006030221965000500282265000690287265000580294165000380299965000460303765000570308385601060314085600910324685600920333785601090342985600940353885600950363216294157KCU20250702151816.0100621s2010    enk      b    001 0 eng    a  2010026356  aGBB0460732bnb7 a0155222462Uk  a9780521199339qhbk.  a0521199336qhbk.  a9780511776434qe-book  a0511776438qe-book  a16294157  a(OCoLC)601048147  aDLCbeng.cKCUdKCUeAACR2  apcc  an-us---ae------aa-cc---00aK7340b.W36 201000222a343.08bWAN1 aWang, Faye Fangfei.eAuthor10aInternet jurisdiction and choice of law :blegal practices in the EU, US and China /cFaye Fangfei Wang.30aLegal practices in the European Union, United States and China  aCambridge ;aNew York :bCambridge University Press,c2010.  axiv, 261 p. ;c24 cm.  atextbtxt2rdacontent  aunmediatedbn2rdamedia  avolumebnc2rdacarrier  aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 241-250) and index.0 aIntroduction -- Jurisdiction in electronic contracting -- EU rules applied in cyber jurisdiction -- US jurisdiction tests employed in e-contracting disputes -- Chinese legislation on jurisdiction -- Choice of law in electronic contracting -- EU internet choice of law regime -- US internet choice of law rules -- Chinese internet choice of law approaches -- Alternative dispute resolution and the internet -- The legal obstacles and solutions to online arbitration and online mediation -- Conclusion and recommendation.  a"The adoption of electronic commercial transactions has facilitated cross-border trade and business, but the complexity of determining the place of business and other connecting factors in cyberspace has challenged existing private international law. This comparison of the rules of internet jurisdiction and choice of law as well as online dispute resolution (ODR) covers both B2B and B2C contracts in the EU, USA and China. It highlights the achievement of the Rome I Regulation in the EU, evaluates the merits of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreement at the international level and gives an insight into the current developments in CIDIP. The in-depth research allows for solutions to be proposed relating to the problems of the legal uncertainty of internet conflict of law and the validity and enforceability of ODR agreements and decisions"--cProvided by publisher.  a"Internet Jurisdiction and Choice of Law: Legal Practices in the EU, US and China takes a "solutions to obstacles" approach, examines the existing jurisdiction and choice of law rules and proposes the interpretation of those rules to the digital age. It discusses the need of the modernisation and harmonisation of private international law, compares current legislative frameworks in the EU, US, China, and suggests a series of ways to remove the obstacles of the determination of Internet jurisdiction and choice of law for cross-border electronic B2B and B2C contracts"--cProvided by publisher. 0aConflict of lawsxElectronic commercezChina. 0aConflict of lawsxElectronic commercezEuropean Union countries. 0aConflict of lawsxElectronic commercezUnited States. 0aOnline dispute resolutionzChina. 0aOnline dispute resolutionzUnited States. 0aOnline dispute resolutionzEuropean Union countries.423Contributor biographical informationuhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1010/2010026356-b.html423Publisher descriptionuhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1010/2010026356-d.html413Table of contents onlyuhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1010/2010026356-t.html423Contributor biographical informationuhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1010/2010026356-b.html423Publisher descriptionuhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1010/2010026356-d.html413Table of contents onlyuhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1010/2010026356-t.html